Namaskaram /u/navaht02, Thank you for your submission. Please provide a source for the image / video (if not a direct link submission). We would really appreciate it if you could mention the source as a reply to this comment! If you have already provided the source or if it is an OC post, please ignore this message. Thank you.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/IndiaSpeaks) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Recent verdicts of supreme court considers women in live-in relationships are titled to get maintenance if she files a case. So, I believe even supreme court is considering women as wives if they are in a live-in relationship.
Bhai context Bata do….spouse ko sex karne ke liye force ni kar rahe…. Cruelty ground for divorce h…aur ek-do saal ki baat ni ho rahi 30 saal ho gaye aur 27 saal se separated h…bas legally divorced ni h…click bait headlines pe mat jao
Indeed , sachchai ke raste pe jaana tha to ye Ghar basane ke sapne kyun dikhaye apni wife ko ?
Jab khud ka man Kiya tab mazey le liye jab waqt aaya to be a good father to his son tab vairagya yaad aaya?
Modi ki young age mein arrange marriage thi aur usko bacha karne ke baad nhi yaad nhi aaya ki deshseva bhi karni hai. Pehle din se clear kar diya koi sapna nhi dikhaya.
Khair, main kya Buddha aur Modi ke chakkar mein pad Raha hoon. Ye bade log Hain ye Jo bhi karein Inka sab maaf hai. Morals to hum jaison ke liye hain.
Got it. But my point is that the lack of specification on what constitutes a long period will not sit well with ‘denying sex is wrong’. It can be easily misused.
>It can be easily misused
Wish people like you and the judiciary showed the same concern when it comes to the likes of section 375, 498A or the whole marital rape fiasco
If anyone not want it at all with their spouse for long time or forever then they should go for divorce .. else not having intercourse and not allowing other half to do that outside is definately a cruelty
Na you're reading this wrong, if sex on the pretense of marriage is wrong then so is marriage on the pretense of periodic sex, thus if one spouse unilaterally causes a dead bedroom for non medical reasons then that should be enough ground for divorce.
Yeah I agree about the part about it being grounds of divorce. But saying that denying sex is wrong and not specifying what a long period of time is, can be misused very easily.
If you can't have sex with the person you are married or the person you love then please be separated. He will get another worthy woman who will understand and acknowledge human needs and what lovers do.
Cruelty only if the victim is a woman. Otherwise it's not. It was around 5-6 months ago I guess, a man filed a same case wherein the wife was refusing intimate relationship. But the court ordered that u can't ask her to be intimate if she doesn't want to.
Yes, but then again the divorce case will go on for 5yrs+ with the man ending up with paying maintenance or alimony. There's hardly 5-10 cases wherein the husband has received maintenance or alimony. Even if he is eligible for it. Courts say that abled bodied person(only in case of man) receiving maintenance/alimony will create idleness.
Not a new thing! This comes under mental cruelty and is a ground for divorce under Hindu Marriage Act,1956 and the same for parsis and Christians. I forgot about the Muslim law! I will have to go revise it again.
I am saying about the misuse of the concept of marital rape. I am not saying it does not happen, and no sensible person will say that should be allowed.
May God protect the judges who gave this decision, a long life.
May he give them with many milch cows, may he provide them with many oxens and asses.
May their fields always be fertile and prosperous.
Source story link https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/not-having-sex-with-spouse-for-long-time-a-form-of-mental-cruelty-says-allahabad-high-court-report-101685066920577.html
What if ED happens after a certain age for some men .. they can't have sex.. its a condition and u don't get a stiffy .. so high court wants them to have sex with what again?
Ah yes, mutual and actual love and affection don't exist and the only way to show your "love" is by having sex with your animal, sex hungry pati"parmeshwar"-
So what you are telling me is that my parents have subjected mental cruelty on each other since my brother was born, and as a result my brother is to blame for this mental cruelty, and therefore he is a criminal.
Namaskaram /u/navaht02, Thank you for your submission. Please provide a source for the image / video (if not a direct link submission). We would really appreciate it if you could mention the source as a reply to this comment! If you have already provided the source or if it is an OC post, please ignore this message. Thank you. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/IndiaSpeaks) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Just sent this to my gf.
I think you missed the word spouse
Bro we are in live in so chalta he
Hello Bajrang dal, I have information about something heinous /s
Jaise unko english samaj aayegi 
Kyu sirf tum hi padhe likhe ho kya.
Mil gaya ek
💀🗿
Lmfao 💀
Hello, this is Bajrang Dal Reddit Helpline support speaking, May I have the status and the basis of your complaint?
Abtaf real id se aa
Bhai thoda dhyan se... kahin fake rape case na ho Jaye...
Ek jhagda aur bhai ki waat lag jayegi
Court me milord sab bhi usi ka baad manenge....
Ek jhagda aur bhai ki wet ho jayegi
Wtf since when is having a gf + live in a spouse…? It’s lack of commitment so it’s usually referred to someone married. 🤧
Live in mein yeh halat? My sincere condolences.
ok just shaadi mat kar baithna
gf is also considered spouse FYI
As per Gen-Z law, yes but as per Constitutional law, no. Can you add her to your ration card or change your marital status to married in any govt ID?
Recent verdicts of supreme court considers women in live-in relationships are titled to get maintenance if she files a case. So, I believe even supreme court is considering women as wives if they are in a live-in relationship.
Nah, just that our constitution is heavily biased towards females.
Whatever benefits women...
>Gen-Z law There is something called GeN-Z Law? Damn, man!
Made by Gen Z
You guys are having gf?
Everyone has one
Sabki nahi hoti, Laxman
XD
Pradhan Mantri Girlfriend Dilayo Yojna when?
Riyal kisi ka bf bhi hota 🌈
What if I am gay?
Gay people don't exist, it's just propaganda
😢
gay way kuch nahi hota.. subah 5 baje utha kar sab thik ho jayega /s
Meri bhi nhi hai bhai tension mat lo
having a girlfriend is a myth, bhai agar sacch hota to teri hoti na!
To your right hand?
Horney gf
She's legally like your wife itself.
... but more like a hologram version.
Bhai context Bata do….spouse ko sex karne ke liye force ni kar rahe…. Cruelty ground for divorce h…aur ek-do saal ki baat ni ho rahi 30 saal ho gaye aur 27 saal se separated h…bas legally divorced ni h…click bait headlines pe mat jao
Also wife doesn't appear in family court they dismissed it so he goes to highcourt
Upar se ek do saal bhi non medical reasons k liye kaafi lamba hai.
Buddha did form of mental cruelty.... I learnt something new today.
Indeed , sachchai ke raste pe jaana tha to ye Ghar basane ke sapne kyun dikhaye apni wife ko ? Jab khud ka man Kiya tab mazey le liye jab waqt aaya to be a good father to his son tab vairagya yaad aaya?
True. Buddha ki wife ki zindagi toh barbaad ho gyi thi.
Same as Modi
Modi ki young age mein arrange marriage thi aur usko bacha karne ke baad nhi yaad nhi aaya ki deshseva bhi karni hai. Pehle din se clear kar diya koi sapna nhi dikhaya. Khair, main kya Buddha aur Modi ke chakkar mein pad Raha hoon. Ye bade log Hain ye Jo bhi karein Inka sab maaf hai. Morals to hum jaison ke liye hain.
Han wo log preach kar k chor dete hai, morals aur laws sabh sirf gareeb ke liye hai
Sach kaha bandhu
Yes, but only a dharmic can criticize him on that.
Shite, I'm an atheist. Wasted opportunity.
Buddha left his wife and infant son. He was a selfish man even by those times.
And that's why he found the wrong answer.
Modiji as well
His wife was free to apply for divorce then, and she would have got divorce on this cruelty reason. With alimony
I hope people remember that when a man puts a post saying his wife doesn't have sex with him.
But us time pe high court ne bola bhi to nahi kuch...
Someone tell Milord🤤 Spouse is a gender neutral term.
Yeah so it goes both ways not for one.
But we are talking about Indian judiciary here...
Tujhe kya lagta hai ki judge sahab milord ghas char k bane hai?
Ha..Indian judiciary,☕
Court should have specified what time is long time since most Indian households in the past did it only for kids and that's the end of it as well.
Court said "denying sex" is wrong. If both spouses don't want to do it then it's their choice ofc
Denying sex is wrong? Isn’t it soft blackmail/coerced sex then? That’s disgusting. Then it also marital rape okay?
You're allowed to withhold consent. The other party is allowed to divorce you.
Got it. But my point is that the lack of specification on what constitutes a long period will not sit well with ‘denying sex is wrong’. It can be easily misused.
>It can be easily misused Wish people like you and the judiciary showed the same concern when it comes to the likes of section 375, 498A or the whole marital rape fiasco
'For a long time' is the keyword.
and even more importantly its primarily to create grounds for divorce. Which is fair. Getting a divorce in a sexless relationship in India is *hard*
Yeah but I guess they haven’t specified a time that’s long. For me 1 day is a long time. For someone 5 years is.
I read somewhere in this case the time is 30 years... so pretty long considering if you get caught doing adultery you go to jail.
30 years lmao if I marry at 30 and my husband doesn’t have sex, I have to wait till I’m 60 to divorce xD
And then the divorce will be finalised by 90 - and you're good to go again ...
Kis duniya mein rehte ho bhai? SC kabh ka adultery law scrap kar diya pata hai?
If anyone not want it at all with their spouse for long time or forever then they should go for divorce .. else not having intercourse and not allowing other half to do that outside is definately a cruelty
Na you're reading this wrong, if sex on the pretense of marriage is wrong then so is marriage on the pretense of periodic sex, thus if one spouse unilaterally causes a dead bedroom for non medical reasons then that should be enough ground for divorce.
Yeah I agree about the part about it being grounds of divorce. But saying that denying sex is wrong and not specifying what a long period of time is, can be misused very easily.
You are misunderstanding it. That's not what they are saying.
If you can't have sex with the person you are married or the person you love then please be separated. He will get another worthy woman who will understand and acknowledge human needs and what lovers do.
He will find no better partner than his right hand!
Polyamory should be made okay.
So if one person doesn't want to do it, forcing them is fine and not cruel?
Hmm.. 🤔🤔🤔 that's why they had so many kids.
Cruelty only if the victim is a woman. Otherwise it's not. It was around 5-6 months ago I guess, a man filed a same case wherein the wife was refusing intimate relationship. But the court ordered that u can't ask her to be intimate if she doesn't want to.
Damn. it seems unfair man!
It should be only used as grounds for divorce. Not forcing sex.
Yes, but then again the divorce case will go on for 5yrs+ with the man ending up with paying maintenance or alimony. There's hardly 5-10 cases wherein the husband has received maintenance or alimony. Even if he is eligible for it. Courts say that abled bodied person(only in case of man) receiving maintenance/alimony will create idleness.
Damn...
That's really unfair
Which court was this? Different HCs have different views
have sex ppl we live once have sex everytime u get chance just use protection dont overpopulate - durex
Or use plastic bag
Wear it on your face while sex
Kinky
We don’t live only once… we never die, just change bodies. 🙏🧡
lol
It's correct tho. I can't see what's wrong? Edit: for men and women it should apply. And always consensual sex.
This report should have emphasis on consent. Nai toh wtf
It is taken for granted because one who is suffering from a dead-bedroom ain't forcing themselves on the spouse.
Not a new thing! This comes under mental cruelty and is a ground for divorce under Hindu Marriage Act,1956 and the same for parsis and Christians. I forgot about the Muslim law! I will have to go revise it again.
Galat kya kaha 😂😂
This has been a ground for divorce for quite a while.
... but how many couples actually use it?
And doing is martial rape. Don't worry. Our higher courts wants men to be monks. So that India become vishwaguru. [Edit: * if you force]
Forcing anything is wrong.
Assuming that any of the marital rape allegations will actually be forced ones
🤣
I'm confused is this guy saying marital rape is not real/should be allowed?
I am saying about the misuse of the concept of marital rape. I am not saying it does not happen, and no sensible person will say that should be allowed.
Who needs sex when we have reddit
I dont like that it says Allahabad high court and not prayagraj high court
No one calls it prayagraj.
haa Yogiji, isi shakhs ke ghar pe aaj bulldozer chalana hai 📸
Rent pe hoon.
It is the actual name of the place now, so shouldn't the people use that?
It varies. Gurgaon is still called Gurgaon by almost everyone. But Mumbai sounds better than Bombay.
Hard disagree. Anecdotal but born and raised in Bombay and along with a good chunk of my community, we still call it Bombay
Wasn't this already a part of hindu marriage and maintenance act?
Shaadi karni hi kyun hai phir jab kuch milna hi nhi hai
Prayagraj
That should be called Prayagraj Highcourt now
Cruela Cruela.... Cruela nikli hai tu
May God protect the judges who gave this decision, a long life. May he give them with many milch cows, may he provide them with many oxens and asses. May their fields always be fertile and prosperous.
This is a long established ground .. nothing new
Ye court wale bhi sax sux ki baate karne lage hai ab
How long is a long time??
2 hours
Bruh💀
Source story link https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/not-having-sex-with-spouse-for-long-time-a-form-of-mental-cruelty-says-allahabad-high-court-report-101685066920577.html
What is the meaning of marriage than....
Not having sex
Seems like a judicial overreach. Judicial activism has limits.
He is granting divorce, not forcing to have sex.
"Allah"Abad.. 😂🤣 Its all in the name..
Modi ji spouse ka bhi intajam Kara do plz Modi ji plz
If a woman says so, otherwise ra**
/r/Deadbedrooms
Define long period
from the case filed in 1979, dont think it matters to either of the party
UP is evolving. Backwards
[Insert Ghost Staring GIF]
What about sibling? Does this rule still apply?
But raping your spouse is not a crime. Hmmmm, progressive.
Jada karo to rape, kam karo to cruelty. Kitni baar karein ye janhit me jaari kardo
I dont get it. why wouldn't people fuck if they got married?
Judge sahab biwi se naraz hai

Din bhar din mera shaadi krne ka man ghat ta ja rha hai
PRAYAGRAJ High court only
Courts are really just encouraging rape over there eh.
Allah-a-bad ... that's sounds very moozlummy! Don't you think it's time to change an evil sounding name like that ...?
People do this eh? Just bang your partner mate, in a world full of stress be a relief to you partner.
Allahabad court lawyers not getting spouse action it seems.
What if ED happens after a certain age for some men .. they can't have sex.. its a condition and u don't get a stiffy .. so high court wants them to have sex with what again?
wow! mr.judge must had a fight with her wife years ago and her wife refused to give it to him XDXD
Another reason to not get married, this stuff seems WAY too complicated. Where is the lau?
Ah yes, mutual and actual love and affection don't exist and the only way to show your "love" is by having sex with your animal, sex hungry pati"parmeshwar"-
Every thing but martial rape is cruel /s
It should be. Having regular sex is good for your health.
Ah yes but marital rape is all fine, is it?
So what you are telling me is that my parents have subjected mental cruelty on each other since my brother was born, and as a result my brother is to blame for this mental cruelty, and therefore he is a criminal.
I have no say in this....
Matlab ab apni marzi se sax sux bhi nahi kar sakte
Modi ji seedhe jail jaa rahe hai is judgement par 🫡
Is 20 years long enough?
Yeh "long time " kaise define hoga ? Libido pe ?
Kind of true ! Ab ladki ka man ho or admi mna krde to dil to dukhega hi ! 👀
Asexuals are doomed.
fir ab?
Milord saab ko koi sax ni mil ra ghar pe. To court mein aake bakchodi kar lo.
Amen ! Finally some good news
so marital rape is an obligation, what's new?
only applicable if your wife is not a feminist!
spouse matlab ?
But wives mostly get fat. Do husbands have to have sex with them? That should also be considered cruelty.