Can't argue with that.

Debatable, for insurgency fighters/saboteurs it is in reverse, as they often operate from enemy stockpiles.

Just a asymmetrical bullpup

Mathematically sum of two sets, one of which contains all things of A, and other all things of non-A("asymmetrical") is a complete set of anything. Tl;DR: You're a bullpup!

Judge thats how ive been fooled into becoming a gun

Yeah? Well your face is a bullpup!  Wait, what were we talking about? 

Doesn't Russia still use a push system? Just say nyet to bullpupski.

This is why Russia is so backwards.

Command is the trigger, combatants are just the barrel.

More like the soldiers are the bullets and logistics are the casing and powder

Ok forward operating bases are still more close to the front than depots and command center and they can coexist.

>Command is the trigger and MIC shareholders are the users

Is there a way to filter out all “bull pup” posts from appearing in my feed? I thought the first couple were clever, but that was about 2000 posts ago.

The dick is a bullpup. Balls are the mag, pipe is the trigger. you already know what them bullets are

No, the warzone is the (end of the) barrel, the command centre is the trigger. That makes possibility for battlefield logistics to be both bull-pup and conventional layout.

I reject this notion, here, take Fortified command centre behind the depot and forward operating base in front of the depot have fun with 3 triggers and one magazine. Battlefield logistic has evolved into ICBM launch facility

Battlefield logistics or neural networks?

both as per mgs4

This looks more like my last Datacenter architecture. It seems like that I could also do military logistics.

Russian logistics is a musket