He never insulted freedom fighters. What he points out is the need of education, he used to say all of your freedom fighter leaders studied in west. To know the difference in freedom or colonial setup one needs to be educated.
He had favourable views about freedom fighters. It can be inferred from his talks. However, India is not really free even now. If there's no press freedom in India, people don't see how it is a problem.
He had not considered India's freedom to be such a significant event. He had not bothered with the concepts of nation, political freedom, or any such social equations.
He was born during a period in which a lot was happening in India. But he rarely considered it significant or spoke about it.
When orthodox religious institutions of that time started attacking him, he sometimes used to make fun of Indian politics and religious and political leaders, but there was nothing serious in that either.
In his early years, he criticised Gandhi and his philosophy. But as time went on, he started to take intensive mediation camps and speak about various techniques.
In his last years, he again spoke about a few things about geopolitics and the world political order. But not with the intention to praise anything.
Here and there, he spoke about a few personalities like Aurobindo and M.N. Roy. (Socio-Political Structure).But always with the context of something else.
He never insulted freedom fighters. What he points out is the need of education, he used to say all of your freedom fighter leaders studied in west. To know the difference in freedom or colonial setup one needs to be educated.
He had favourable views about freedom fighters. It can be inferred from his talks. However, India is not really free even now. If there's no press freedom in India, people don't see how it is a problem.
He had not considered India's freedom to be such a significant event. He had not bothered with the concepts of nation, political freedom, or any such social equations. He was born during a period in which a lot was happening in India. But he rarely considered it significant or spoke about it. When orthodox religious institutions of that time started attacking him, he sometimes used to make fun of Indian politics and religious and political leaders, but there was nothing serious in that either. In his early years, he criticised Gandhi and his philosophy. But as time went on, he started to take intensive mediation camps and speak about various techniques. In his last years, he again spoke about a few things about geopolitics and the world political order. But not with the intention to praise anything. Here and there, he spoke about a few personalities like Aurobindo and M.N. Roy. (Socio-Political Structure).But always with the context of something else.
https://www.osho.com/osho-online-library/osho-talks/the-self-depth-ravana-5516ea8b-299?p=db877a89dc1fa44517da4cb36098723f